In my view, it’s crucial for policy experts to engage the public for two reasons. The first is the moral duty. Society only evolves when knowledge is shared and distributed. Arguably, this socialization is what turns information into knowledge. And there’s a more pragmatic reason, based on the way democracy has changed in the UK, US, and elsewhere. The public have access and influence over policy makers like never before. Decisions are not made in a vacuum. If experts don’t engage in public conversations, don’t be surprised if their expertise is ignored when policies are formed, in favor of those who have.
Search results
Sorry, no results.
Please try another keyword
- is_single_v1US Air National GuardAfter a Norfolk Southern train carrying toxic chemicals derailed in East Palestine, Ohio, residents were told the air was safe and the situation was under control. But for many people living there, the emergency never really ended. In this episode, East Palestine resident and Rail Watch founder Jess Conard takes us inside the chaos and[...]
00:00
Tom Hashemi
In my view, it's crucial for policy experts to engage the public for two reasons. The first is the moral duty. Society only evolves when knowledge is shared and distributed. Arguably, this socialization is what turns information into knowledge. And there's a more pragmatic reason, based on the way democracy has changed in the UK, US, and elsewhere. The public have access and influence over policy makers like never before. Decisions are not made in a vacuum. If experts don't engage in public conversations, don't be surprised if their expertise is ignored when policies are formed, in favor of those who have.
Words: Laicie Heeley
Date:
