Skip to content

In Photos: Inside India’s ‘Nuclear Graveyard’

Critics say the true price of India's nuclear ambitions is on the shoulders of indigenous villagers.

Words: Abid R. Baba
Pictures: Yousuf Sarfaraz
Date:

Aakash Sardar, a six-year-old boy from India’s Jadugoda, lives with deformed feet. According to his mother, Sunita Sardar, he has not yet been issued a birth certificate by local authorities. Sunita says that without a birth certificate, Aakash cannot register for an Aadhar Card, an identification document the boy would need for a bank account to be opened in his name or in order to apply for disability compensation. His father, who worked as a mason, passed away from tuberculosis in 2021. 

These hardships are common in India’s far-flung eastern state of Jharkhand. India is one of nine nuclear-armed nations in the world, but far from the country’s corridors of power is Jadugoda, a largely forgotten town tucked among the region’s mineral-rich forests. For more than five decades, Jadugoda’s indigenous Adivasi communities have paid the true price of the country’s nuclear arsenal. One in three residences is home to someone with a physical or intellectual disability. 

Aakash Sardar's mother says she has struggled to get her son a birth certificate (Yousuf Sarfaraz)
Aakash Sardar’s mother says she has struggled to get her son a birth certificate (Yousuf Sarfaraz)

Women in Jadugoda often speak of repeat miscarriages — some losing up to six pregnancies — and children are born with missing eyes, malformed limbs, and disfigurements on their faces. At the same time, cancer, infertility, skin diseases, and early deaths are routine. 

In the early morning haze, children in the villages of Dungridih and Bango walk past steaming tailing ponds — the open, rust‑stained sludge from uranium milling pooling dangerously close to homes. Around them, houses cluster within a few hundred yards, and fields irrigated with contaminated water sway in the breeze. Yet even as the machinery hums and miners head underground, a more silent threat lingers above ground: radiation.

Each day, villagers turn to the tributaries of the Subarnarekha River to drink, bathe, and wash — often unaware that the water they depend on carries a hidden danger.

In Jadugoda, the journey of uranium from ore to reactor fuel begins at the processing plants, where raw rock is crushed, ground, and chemically treated in a process known as leaching. This transforms the ore into a concentrated uranium compound called uranium peroxide — commonly known as yellowcake. Once processed, the yellowcake is packed into drums and transported to the Nuclear Fuel Complex (NFC) in Hyderabad for enrichment.

But what’s left behind in this process tells a far more troubling story.

The milling stage produces an enormous volume of radioactive waste in the form of a thick liquid slurry. This toxic waste is flushed out through long pipelines that cut through villages and forests, ultimately emptying into vast tailing ponds. As the liquid settles in these ponds, the heavier radioactive residue — known as tailings — forms a sand-like layer. During storms or strong winds, this contaminated dust often blows into nearby homes, fields, and water bodies.

There are three such tailings ponds in Jadugoda, all constructed and maintained by the Uranium Corporation of India Limited (UCIL), a public-sector company under the Department of Atomic Energy. Each pond is surrounded on three sides by hills carved out from mining, with the fourth side enclosed by an embankment that receives a constant flow of radioactive waste through pipelines.

A warning sign sits in overgrown shrubbery near a tailing pond (Yousuf Sarfaraz)
A warning sign sits in overgrown shrubbery near a tailing pond (Yousuf Sarfaraz)

Villagers say these man-made hills and tailing ponds have turned into slow, silent threats to their lives. What was once forest land now stores toxic remnants of uranium extraction. Local communities have long complained that these ponds are contaminating both groundwater and the nearby Subarnarekha River, posing serious health risks with every passing year. 

Jadugoda, where India’s first uranium mining site was built in 1967, provides nearly a quarter of the uranium for the nation’s nuclear power program. Its tailings ponds — unlined, open-air reservoirs holding waste from milling — have spread radioactive dust and leachate in nearby villages for decades. Local residents and independent researchers have repeatedly recorded alarming levels of exposure: Water drawn from shallow groundwater and the Chandnadi stream contains uranium levels hundreds of micrograms per liter — far above the World Health Organization’s limit of 30 ppb and India’s limit of 60 ppb or less. These levels translate to cumulative internal exposure through ingestion, inhalation, and dust, especially dangerous over years of daily contact. 

Local communities have long complained that these ponds are contaminating both groundwater and the nearby Subarnarekha River (Yousuf Sarfaraz)
Local communities have long complained that these ponds are contaminating both groundwater and the nearby Subarnarekha River (Yousuf Sarfaraz)

Many women born with conjoined fingers, shared how miscarriages and infertility turned them into social outcasts — labeled baanjh (Hindi for sterile) — dragged from homes and rejected in marriage markets. A 2010 epidemiological survey by Indian Doctors for Peace and Development documented a slate of hardships: alarmingly high rates of infertility, stillbirths, and abortions; a higher prevalence of chronic lung disease and pediatric mortality; and markedly lower life expectancy in the villages that sit within a 2.5-kilometer (1.5-mile) radius of tailing ponds. 

These statistics cut deeper when layered atop local stories: of children born with undersized heads, deformed limbs, facial tumors, seizures.

Still, the state-run Uranium Corporation of India Limited (UCIL) insists there is no link between radiation and these ailments, dismissing concerns as “long-standing myths” not rooted in scientific research. A Bhabha Atomic Research Centre‑backed survey claimed anomalies were due to malaria, malnutrition, genetics, and not radiation. UCIL leaders have asserted there were no illnesses related to radiation exposure and downplayed safety concerns despite minimal testing, secret dosimeter readings, and removal of warning signs across villages 

While UCIL highlights employment — including some 4,700 tribal workers — and infrastructure development, critics argue those tangibles obscure the costs: health, dignity, futures lost to invisible radiation etching itself into their bodies. As India races toward 63 GW of nuclear capacity by 2032 and strives to ensure that 25% of electricity is supplied by nuclear sources by 2050, Jadugoda remains its beat and its blemish. India aims to produce 40,000 MW of nuclear power by 2030. But at what cost? 

Anamika Oraon, 20, says she cannot afford treatment for a tumor on her face (Yousuf Sarfaraz)
Anamika Oraon, 20, says she cannot afford treatment for a tumor on her face (Yousuf Sarfaraz)

Not far away, 20-year-old Anamika Oraon lives in the village of Dungridih, less than a mile from the Narwa Pahar uranium mine. She dropped out of school after the eighth grade and now works a laborer on nearby farms from eight in the morning until four o’clock in the afternoon, earning only ₹200 (about $2.29).

Balhi Hembran, 47, requires constant company in her day-to-day life (Yousuf Sarfaraz)
Balhi Hembran, 47, requires constant company in her day-to-day life (Yousuf Sarfaraz)

Anamika wants to study again, but a malignant tumor on her face causes frequent, severe headaches that make it impossible. “A block officer came to see me last month,” she said, sitting in the dim light of her home. “He told me to visit Saddar Hospital in Jamshedpur to get examined for a disability certificate. But who will go with me?”

She says the deformity on her face is slowly getting worse. She cannot afford treatment and has no way of reaching a hospital.

Balhi Hembran, 47, lives in Bhatin village near Jadugoda. Her legs are severely deformed, and she cannot walk without support. For years, she has remained mostly indoors.

Her elderly mother, Malti Hembran, worries constantly. “I’m afraid to let her go out alone,” she explains. “What if something happens to her? What if someone harms her?” Balhi always requires someone by her side, even if it is just to step out of the house. But in a village where help is scarce and fear is constant, she often stays where she feels safest: behind closed doors.

At his modest home in Tilaitaand, Jadugoda, 61-year-old Ghanshyam Birulee sat surrounded by silence and memory. He is a cofounder of the Jharkhandi Organisation Against Radiation (JOAR), and his fight is personal. JOAR was formed in 1998, emerging from a student-led movement advocating for Adivasi rights. 

Birulee explained that over the years, the group has carried out extensive research, and based on their observations, many of the illnesses in the region appear to be linked to radiation exposure or heavy metals. His own father died of lung cancer in 1984. Then in 1991, lung cancer took his mother. “She never worked in mines,  but by the time we learned the reason, my family was doomed.”

“People used to say this forest was cursed,” he said. “But it’s not a curse — it is radiation.” He went on, “As a son, I carry the pain. As an activist, I raise my voice.”

Ghanshyam Birulee lost both of his parents to cancer (Yousuf Sarfaraz)
Ghanshyam Birulee lost both of his parents to cancer (Yousuf Sarfaraz)

Still, not everyone can join his campaign to push back. Many who live with illness and deformities continue to work for UCIL, trapped by fear and the financial needs of survival. “They won’t speak. They’re afraid of losing the only job they have,” he said.

He has met leaders and has pleaded for help, but insisted that, in return, the community’s concerns have been ignored. “This place is slowly killing us. The government must act with urgency — like it’s a war. Because for us, it already is,” he says. “Forty percent of the total minerals are available in Jharkhand, but what did we get in return?” He pauses, then offers an answer to his own question: “We get cancers, abortions, disabilities, and deformities.”

Chatua Das says his wife gave birth to five children, none of whom survived (Yousuf Sarfaraz)
Chatua Das says his wife gave birth to five children, none of whom survived (Yousuf Sarfaraz)

Elsewhere in Jadugoda, Chatua Das said he has spent several years carrying quiet grief. His wife gave birth to five children — none of them survived. Their sixth child, Gudiya Das, lived for 13 years before dying of cerebral palsy. Chatua’s eyes burned with anger as he spoke.

“How much more can a father lose?” he asked.

He dreams of leaving the village, of starting over somewhere far from the shadow of the uranium mines, but poverty has left him stuck there.

In the nearby village of Lipiguttu, 38-year-old Malti Singh lives with her ailing mother. She has visible deformities in her limbs and relies entirely on her mother for daily support. “She is old and unwell herself,” Malti said, “but she still takes care of me. If something happens to her, I don’t know what will become of me.”

Their small home rarely sees visitors. “Not many guests come here anymore,” she explained. “All the girls I grew up with are married now. I didn’t even get one proposal — because of my disability. Everyone is busy in their own lives. No one calls.”

Malti Singh worries about how she will get by if her ailing mother passes away (Yousuf Sarfaraz)
Malti Singh worries about how she will get by if her ailing mother passes away (Yousuf Sarfaraz)

Malti finished her schooling in the village, but college was 20 kilometers (12.47 miles) away, across rough terrain. “There was no transport,” she said. “I couldn’t travel every day, so I had to give up.”

Her father once worked as a labourer in the Rakha mines. She says she doesn’t know much about uranium or mining — only that her body, like many others around her, has never been the same.

In the village of Badeguttu, 14-year-old Sajan Murmu is almost always tied with a rope. His family says it is not out of cruelty — but out of fear and love. Sajan lives with a severe form of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, or ADHD, and his family worries constantly for his safety. “He knows how to run away,” his grandfather, Nathuram Murmu, says while gently washing the boy’s hands, “but he doesn’t know how to come back.”

“He knows how to run away, but he doesn’t know how to come back.” – Nathuram Murmu

Nathuram, now in his 60s, is the one who bathes Sajan, feeds him, and watches over him every day. More challenging still, their home is located deep in the forest, far from clinics and other medical facilities.

Elsewhere, in the village of Bango, 22-year-old Sanjay Gope has limited mobility. His father has managed to get him what is known as a Unique Disability identification card — a rare success in a place where access to rights often feels like a distant promise. The card confirms that Sanjay is officially recognized by the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment and is eligible for a disability pension.

Still, recognition on paper hasn’t translated into a better standard of living. Sanjay’s wheelchair sits locked and folded outside their house, gathering dust. “He wants to travel, to see other parts of India,” his father told me. “But we just can’t make it happen.”

The wheelchair is there — but the road, the resources, and the support system are missing. 

Abid R. Baba

Abid R. Baba is a reporter, storyteller, and researcher based in Jammu and Kashmir, India. His work spans social issues, sports, and politics. Over the years, he has been involved in various projects with organizations such as the American India Foundation, TERI, and ICSSR. He also contributed to All India Radio’s Srinagar station for six years, producing over 100 audio segments during that time. Abid was the first recipient of the Narender Revelli National Media Fellowship. He also received a Community Impact Fund grant for his project Reframing Disability Narratives in Indian Media.

Hey there!

You made it to the bottom of the page! That means you must like what we do. In that case, can we ask for your help? Inkstick is changing the face of foreign policy, but we can’t do it without you. If our content is something that you’ve come to rely on, please make a tax-deductible donation today. Even $5 or $10 a month makes a huge difference. Together, we can tell the stories that need to be told.

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTERS