Skip to content
Decline in International Students Could Be Dangerous Over Time

Decline in International Students Could Come Back to Bite

Words: Nathan Urban and Ariel C. Armony
Pictures: Green Chameleon

When the number of international students at US colleges and universities declines, commentators often focus on the economic impact the decline will have on individual universities and communities.

As experts who specialize in global affairs and international education, we see a more serious threat: A diminished ability for the United States to shape and influence future leaders of the world.

Studies have shown that personal contact with the US shapes individuals’ dispositions toward the United States. Being part of a university community is a concrete and profound experience that exposes international students to the diversity of people, cultures and places in America.

When America’s policies and values are seen as legitimate in the eyes of others, it enhances the nation’s “soft power” – that is, its ability to persuade others to do what it wants without force or coercion.


Currently about 20 percent of all undergraduate and graduate students studying internationally study in the US.

There is a long tradition of some of these international students becoming world leaders. Recent examples include UN Secretary Generals Kofi Annan and Ban-Ki Moon.

Annan, who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize jointly with the United Nations in 2001, described his experience as a student at Macalester College as transformational. “The values and lessons I picked up here stayed with me throughout my life,” Annan said earlier this year as he visited his alma mater to dedicate an institute for global citizenship that bears his name.

The United States is still in an enviable position to attract the best students from around the world and expose them to American culture and values. Its colleges dominate global rankings. We believe that maintaining this position should be a top priority for American policymakers. As political scientist Joseph Nye has argued regarding “soft power,” “the ability to shape the preferences of others” is a most valuable asset in world politics.


Soft power rests on a country’s ability to get others to “admire its values, emulate its example, and aspire to its level of prosperity and openness.” Sympathetic feelings toward the US built from personal experiences are vital in shaping pro-US attitudes and behaviors. They also play a major role in the promotion of democratic values and individual rights around the world.

Sympathetic feelings toward the US built from personal experiences are vital in shaping pro-US attitudes and behaviors.

An example of this is former Pakistani President Benazir Bhutto, the first woman to lead a democratically elected government in an Islamic country. Bhutto was educated at Harvard. She once said that coming to a land where “there is freedom, where young students can criticize the president without being sent to prison,” fueled her own belief in the democratic system.

US-educated leaders are not limited to the political sphere. Corporate heads educated in the United States have also gained direct experience with the country’s culture of entrepreneurship, innovation and philanthropy.

For instance, Ratan Tata, CEO of one of India’s largest and most influential companies, was educated at Cornell. Tata has directed substantial new investment to the United States. He has expanded his company’s reach into Western markets by buying and restoring famous brands such as automakers Jaguar and Land Rover.

As chairman of Tata Trusts, he joined forces with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to try to solve public health issues. He emphasizes a strategic approach to philanthropy based on the sustainability of the communities in which companies work.

The University of Pittsburgh, where we work, contributed to the education of many of the leaders of modern South Korea, one of the United States’ most important strategic and economic partners in East Asia.


For instance, in 1967, young diplomat Byong Hyon Kwon came to the University of Pittsburgh to study international affairs. Kwon later became the lead negotiator in efforts to establish diplomatic relations between his country and China. He also played a fundamental role in the establishment of South Korea’s Overseas International Cooperation Agency. Both outcomes contributed to making the US safer by aligning geopolitical and development agendas with US national interests.

Sang-joo Lee, who earned a PhD in education at the University of Pittsburgh in 1971, is known as “the Father of Korean Baseball” due to his role in the creation of the Korea Baseball Organization. When millions of Korean fans watch the KBO games on TV, they are connecting in a profound way with the United States. While the connection over a shared pastime may seem simple, its ability to build a shared cultural language is immeasurable.

The ConversationThe bottom line is that as the enrollment of international students decreases at US universities, the impact is not just financial. The decline means fewer of the future leaders of the world will ever get the chance to experience the soul of America.

Nathan Urban, Vice Provost for Graduate Studies and Strategic Initiatives, University of Pittsburgh and Ariel C. Armony, Vice Provost for Global Affairs, University of Pittsburgh.

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

Nathan Urban and Ariel C. Armony

Hey there!

You made it to the bottom of the page! That means you must like what we do. In that case, can we ask for your help? Inkstick is changing the face of foreign policy, but we can’t do it without you. If our content is something that you’ve come to rely on, please make a tax-deductible donation today. Even $5 or $10 a month makes a huge difference. Together, we can tell the stories that need to be told.